Questions to aid the analysis of postmodernity of TV adverts
If you consider it alongside the the later Tango Parody what is post modern about this famous TV advert from 2006?
Are its associations merely arbitary or can audiences actively interpret these adverts?
Consider also whether the brand in the advert is more important than its product(s), which are regularly improved and up-dated with new models.
Which produce the greater meanings and associations for audiences the product or the logo? (Give reasons)
What are the meanings and associations produced in these adverts?
In what ways is this form of advertising powerful or ineffectual in reaching audiences/consumers?
Why type of audiences does it work best with: mass or niche audiences and why?
How do adverts like this one "emotionally connect" audiences with the product?
What is the sense of "spectacle" here?
How were these products advertised in earlier decades when modernist mass consumption was the norm? (Have a look at some of the earlier adverts on YouTube.)
How were these products advertised in earlier decades when modernist mass consumption was the norm? (Have a look at some of the earlier adverts on YouTube.)
Here's another parody of the bouncy balls advert:
No comments:
Post a Comment